Military Wiki

Operation PBFORTUNE, also known as Operation FORTUNE, was the name of a covert United States operation to overthrow the democratically elected Guatemalan President Jacobo Árbenz in 1952. The operation was authorized by US President Harry Truman and planned by the Central Intelligence Agency. The United Fruit Company had lobbied intensively for the overthrow because landmark land reform enacted by Árbenz threatened its economic interests. The coup attempt was also motivated by US fears that the government of Árbenz was being influenced by communists. It involved providing weapons to the exiled Guatemalan military officer Carlos Castillo Armas, who was to lead an invasion from Nicaragua. The coup was planned with the knowledge and support of Anastasio Somoza García, Rafael Leonidas Trujillo and Marcos Pérez Jiménez, the US-backed right-wing dictators of Nicaragua, Dominican Republic and Venezuela respectively, as well as the United Fruit Company. However, the US State Department discovered that details of the plan had become too widely known.[1] US Secretary of State Dean Acheson was worried that the coup attempt would damage the image of the US, which had committed to a policy of non-intervention, and so terminated the operation.[2] Operation PBFORTUNE was a precursor to Operation PBSUCCESS, the covert operation that toppled Árbenz and ended the Guatemalan Revolution in 1954.[3]


Mural in Guatemala City depicting Árbenz

A mural celebrating Guatemalan President Jacobo Árbenz and his landmark agrarian reform, which benefited 500,000 people[4]

From the late 19th century until 1944 Guatemala was governed by a series of authoritarian rulers. Between 1898 and 1920 Manuel Estrada Cabrera granted significant concessions to the United Fruit Company and dispossessed many indigenous peoples of their communal land.[5][6] Under Jorge Ubico, who ruled as a dictator between 1931 and 1944, this process was intensified, with the institution of brutal labor regulations and the establishment of a police state.[7][8]

In June 1944, a popular pro-democracy movement led by university students and labor organizations forced Ubico to resign.[9] Ubico handed over power to a military junta[10] that was toppled in a military coup led by Jacobo Árbenz in October 1944, an event known as the "October Revolution."[11] The coup leaders called for open elections, which were won by Juan José Arévalo, a progressive professor of philosophy who had become the face of the popular movement. He implemented a moderate program of social reform, including a widely successful literacy campaign and largely free elections, although illiterate women were not given the vote, and communist parties were banned.[12]

Following the end of Arévalo's highly popular presidency in 1951, Árbenz was elected to the presidency.[13][14] He continued the reforms of Arévalo and also began an ambitious land reform program known as Decree 900. Under it, the uncultivated portions of large land-holdings were expropriated in return for compensation[4] and redistributed to poverty-stricken agricultural laborers.[15] Due to the political climate of the Cold War, the US was already predisposed to see the socialist policies of the democratically elected Arévalo and Árbenz as communist. This conception had been strengthened by Arévalo's support for the Caribbean Legion, and by the 1950s the US government was considering overthrowing Árbenz.[16][17]

The attitude of the United States was also influenced by the Monroe Doctrine, a philosophy of foreign policy articulated by James Monroe in 1823,[18][19] and which justified the maintenance of US hegemony in the region.[20] The stated aim of the doctrine was to maintain order and stability and to make certain that access to resources and markets was not limited.[19] The historian Mark Gilderhus states that the doctrine also contained racially condescending language, which likened Latin American countries to fighting children.[19] The US government did not need to engage in military interventions in Guatemala to enforce this hegemony, given the presence of military rulers friendly to the US;[20] nevertheless, the doctrine was used to justify the coup in 1954.[21]


Walter Bedell Smith, the Director of Central Intelligence during the operation
Allen Dulles, the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence during the operation

Somoza's visit

In May 1952, Árbenz enacted Decree 900, the official title of the Guatemalan agrarian reform law.[22] The law convinced the US government that the Guatemalan government was being influenced by communists.[22] Approximately 500,000 people benefited from the decree.[4] However, the United Fruit Company lost several hundred thousand acres of its uncultivated land to this law, and the compensation it received was based on the grossly undervalued price that it had presented to the Guatemalan government for tax purposes.[16] The company therefore intensified its lobbying in Washington against the Guatemalan government.[16] The CIA started to explore the notion of lending support to detractors and opponents of Árbenz. Walter Bedell Smith, the Director of Central Intelligence, ordered J. C. King, the chief of the Western Hemisphere Division, to examine whether dissident Guatemalans could topple the Árbenz government if they had support from the dictatorships in Central America.[23] At this point the US government was approached by Anastasio Somoza García, the US-backed dictator of Nicaragua. Somoza had been on a private visit to the United States, during which he made public speeches praising the United States, and was awarded a medal by New York City.[24][25] During a meeting with Truman and his senior staff, Somoza stated that if he were given the weapons, he would "clean up Guatemala."[24] Truman's personal military adviser, Major General Harry H. Vaughan, persuaded Truman to explore the opportunity further, and Truman asked Smith to follow up.[25]

Carlos Castillo Armas

Although the proposal was not taken seriously at the time, US Colonel Cornelius Mara flew back to Nicaragua with Somoza to further explore the idea.[24] Somoza persuaded Mara that the plan was feasible, and Mara returned to the US and gave Truman a favorable report.[26] Smith also sent a Spanish-speaking engineer[lower-alpha 1] under the codename "Seekford"[28] to contact exiled Guatemalan army officer Carlos Castillo Armas and his fellow dissidents, who were in Honduras and Guatemala.[25] Castillo Armas had been expelled from the country in 1949 following a failed coup attempt against Arévalo.[29] Castillo Armas had been a protégé of Francisco Javier Arana, and had risen in the military to become the head of the military academy of Guatemala by 1949.[30] Following the failed coup of 1949, Árbenz had him imprisoned under doubtful charges until December 1949, when he came to the attention of the CIA. A month later, a CIA officer found him attempting to get weapons from Somoza and Trujillo.[30] He met with the CIA a few more times before November 1950, when he launched a brazen attack against Matamoros, the largest fortress in the capital, and was jailed for it before bribing his way out of prison.[31] Castillo Armas told the CIA that he had the support of the Civil Guard (Guardia Civil), the garrison at Quezaltenango, and the commander of Matamoros.[30] The engineer dispatched by the CIA also informed them that Castillo Armas had the financial backing of Somoza and Trujillo.[25] Truman thereupon authorized Operation PBFORTUNE, but according to the historian Piero Gleijeses, did not inform the US State Department, or secretary of state Dean Acheson of the plan.[26] Based upon an examination of declassified documents, however, the historian Nick Cullather has stated that the CIA did, in fact, seek State Department approval before authorizing the plan, and that undersecretary of state David K. E. Bruce provided explicit approval for it.[32] CIA Deputy Director Allen Dulles had previously contacted State Department official Thomas Mann and the Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs Edward G. Miller, Jr.. Both these individuals had stated that they wanted a new government in Guatemala even if it involved the use of force, but did not explicitly tell Dulles to take any action to topple Árbenz.[32]

The plot

The details of the plot were finalized over the next few weeks by the CIA, the United Fruit Company, and Somoza. The coup plotters contacted Rafael Leonidas Trujillo and Marcos Pérez Jiménez, the US-supported right-wing dictators of the Dominican Republic and Venezuela, respectively. The two dictators were supportive of the plan, and agreed to contribute some funding.[26] Although PBFORTUNE was officially approved on September 9, 1952, various planning steps had been taken earlier in the year. In January 1952, officers in the CIA's Directorate of Plans compiled a list of "top flight Communists whom the new government would desire to eliminate immediately in the event of a successful anti-Communist coup."[33] The assassination plans represented the first time that the US had considered assassination in Guatemala.[34] The list of targets had been drawn up by the CIA even before the operation had been formally authorized. They were created using a list of communists that the Guatemalan army had compiled in 1949, as well as its own intelligence.[28] Nine months later the CIA also received through Seekford a list of 58 Guatemalans that Castillo Armas wanted killed, in addition to 74 others that he wanted arrested.[28] Seekford also said that Trujillo's support was conditional on the assassination of four individuals from Santo Domingo who were at that point living in Guatemala.[28] The plan was to involve no direct intervention from the US. It was instead to have been carried out by Castillo Armas.[26]

When contacted by the CIA agent dispatched by Smith, Castillo Armas had proposed a battle-plan to gain CIA support. This plan involved three forces invading Guatemala from Mexico, Honduras, and El Salvador.[25] These invasions were supposed to be supported by internal rebellions.[25][lower-alpha 2] King formulated a plan to provide Castillo Armas with $225,000 as well as weaponry and transportation. His plan also suggested that Somoza and Juan Manuel Galvez, the President of Honduras, be persuaded to provide air support, in addition to other help.[32] The proposal went to Dulles. It also emphasized the relatively small role that the CIA was supposed to play, and stated that the plot would probably go ahead without the CIA's support, but would likely fail and lead to a crackdown on anti-Communist forces.[32]

Execution and termination

US Secretary of State Dean Acheson, whose intervention ended the operation

The plan was put into motion in autumn 1952 by the CIA.[35] J.C. King had obtained weapons from the stock of those that had been confiscated by port authorities in the city of New York. These included 250 rifles, 380 pistols, 64 machine guns, and 4500 grenades.[1][lower-alpha 3] The United Fruit Company lent one of its freighters to the CIA. The freighter was specially refitted and loaded with weapons in New Orleans under the guise of agricultural machinery.[35] It was scheduled to sail to Nicaragua in early October 1952.[2] The CIA had encouraged Somoza and Galvez to provide support to Castillo Armas' forces. Somoza, however, informed several government officials across Central America of the CIA's role in the coup attempt. Somoza's son Tacho, for instance, casually asked Miller whether "the machinery" was on its way at a meeting in Panama.[2]

Accounts of the final termination of the coup attempt vary between historians. Gleijeses stated that while the freighter was on its way to Nicaragua, a CIA employee went to Miller, and asked him to sign a document on behalf of the munitions department.[26] Miller refused, and instead showed the document to his superiors, who in turn informed Dean Acheson.[26] Gleijeses writes that Acheson immediately spoke to Truman as a result of this document, and the operation was cut short.[26] Nick Cullather writes that due to Somoza spreading the word about the coup, the State Department decided that the cover of the operation had been lost.[2] Other diplomats began to learn of the operation, and on 8 October Dean Acheson summoned Smith and called off the operation.[2]

Acheson was particularly worried that allowing the details of the coup to go public would damage the image of the US. The Rio Pact of 1947 had created the Organization of American States, or OAS, and this body had obtained jurisdiction over regional disputes from the United Nations.[2] In order to achieve this, the US had also committed to a policy of non-intervention in the internal affairs of other countries. If PBFORTUNE had become public knowledge, the fact that the US was supporting an invasion of a country that was also a member of the OAS would have represented a huge setback to US policy.[2] Thus the State Department promptly ended the operation when they became aware that its cover was blown.[2]


The termination of the operation caught the CIA by surprise, and King quickly attempted to salvage what he could.[2] The freighter was redirected to Panama, where the arms were unloaded;[26] King kept the weapons there in the hope that the project could be rejuvenated.[2] Castillo Armas was paid a retainer of $3000 a week, which allowed him to maintain a small force. The CIA remained in contact with him, and continued to provide support to the rebels.[36] The CIA found it difficult to end the operation without drawing attention to it.[37] Peréz Jimenez opened a line of credit that would allow Castillo Armas to purchase airplanes, and Trujillo and Somoza continued to support the operation, although they acknowledged that it would have to be postponed.[37] The money paid to Castillo Armas has been described as a way of making sure that he did not attempt any premature action.[37] Even after the operation had been terminated, the CIA received reports from Seekford that the Guatemalan rebels were planning assassinations. Castillo Armas made plans to use groups of soldiers in civilian clothing from Nicaragua, Honduras, and El Salvador to kill communist leaders in Guatemala.[38] King continued to explore the CIA's ability to move arms around Central America without the approval of the State Department.[36]

In November 1952, Dwight Eisenhower was elected president of the US. Eisenhower's campaign had promised a more hawkish stance against communism. Many senior figures in his cabinet, including John Foster Dulles and his brother Allen, had close connections to the United Fruit Company, which made Eisenhower more strongly predisposed than Truman to support Árbenz's overthrow.[39][36] In June 1954, the US trained and funded an invasion force led by Castillo Armas, backed by an intense campaign of psychological warfare by the CIA.[40] Árbenz resigned on 27 June 1954, ending the Guatemalan Revolution.[41] From 1954 onwards Guatemala was ruled by a series of US-backed military dictators, leading to the Guatemalan Civil War.[42] 200,000 civilians were killed in the war, and numerous human rights violations committed, including massacres of civilian populations, rape, aerial bombardment, and forced disappearances.[43] 93% of these violations were committed by the United States-backed military, which included a genocidal scorched-earth campaign against the indigenous Maya population in the 1980s.[43]

See also


  1. Secret History, by Nick Cullather, is based on declassified documents from the US Central Intelligence Agency. Several of these documents are redacted, leaving out certain information, redactions which have been reproduced in Cullather's text.[27] The name of the engineer dispatched to Guatemala has been redacted.
  2. The name of the individual who was supposed to lead the internal uprisings has been redacted in the CIA documents.
  3. Details of other types of weapons have been redacted in the CIA documents.[32]


  1. 1.0 1.1 Cullather 1999, pp. 29–31.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 Cullather 1999, p. 31.
  3. Immerman 1982, pp. 118–122.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Gleijeses 1991, pp. 149–164.
  5. Forster 2001, pp. 12–15.
  6. Gleijeses 1991, pp. 10–11.
  7. Forster 2001, pp. 29–32.
  8. Cullather 1999, pp. 9–10.
  9. Forster 2001, p. 86.
  10. Gleijeses 1991, p. 27.
  11. Immerman 1982, p. 42.
  12. Immerman 1982, pp. 46–49.
  13. Cullather 1999, p. 11.
  14. Gleijeses 1991, pp. 73–84.
  15. Immerman 1982, pp. 64–67.
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 Schlesinger & Kinzer 1999, p. 72–77.
  17. Immerman 1982, pp. 82–100.
  18. Streeter 2000, p. 8.
  19. 19.0 19.1 19.2 Gilderhus 2006.
  20. 20.0 20.1 Streeter 2000, pp. 8–10.
  21. Smith 1995, p. 6.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Gleijeses 1991, p. 228.
  23. Cullather 1999, p. 27.
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 Gleijeses 1991, pp. 228–229.
  25. 25.0 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 25.5 Cullather 1999, p. 28.
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.4 26.5 26.6 26.7 Gleijeses 1991, pp. 229–230.
  27. Cullather 1999, p. 2.
  28. 28.0 28.1 28.2 28.3 Hanhimäki & Westad 2004, p. 456.
  29. Gleijeses 1991, pp. 59–69.
  30. 30.0 30.1 30.2 Cullather 1999, p. 12.
  31. Cullather 1999, pp. 12–13.
  32. 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 32.4 Cullather 1999, p. 29.
  33. Haines 1995.
  34. Callanan 2009, p. 126.
  35. 35.0 35.1 Gleijeses 1991, p. 230.
  36. 36.0 36.1 36.2 Cullather 1999, p. 32.
  37. 37.0 37.1 37.2 De La Pedraja 2013, pp. 27–28.
  38. Hanhimäki & Westad 2004, pp. 456–457.
  39. Immerman 1982, pp. 122–127.
  40. Immerman 1982, pp. 161–170.
  41. Schlesinger & Kinzer 1999, pp. 190–204.
  42. Grandin 2000, p. 28.
  43. 43.0 43.1 McAllister 2010.


External links

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).