Action of 18 March 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of Piracy in Somalia, Operation Enduring Freedom - Horn of Africa | |||||||
Pirate vessel burning (Center). Pirate vessel burning after engaging US forces | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
United States | Somali Pirates | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
![]() ![]() | unknown | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
1 cruiser 1 destroyer | 3 skiffs | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
1 cruiser superficially damaged |
1 skiff destroyed 2 skiffs captured 1+ killed 5 wounded 12 captured |
|

USS Gonzalez
The Action of 18 March 2006 occurred when two United States naval vessels were attacked by pirates. The U.S. ships were part of Combined Task Force 150.
Background[]
By 2006 the lack of any government-controlled naval authority along the Somali coast was taking its toll. Pirate gangs controlled by local warlords started to capture passing merchant ships in an attempt to gain funding by ransoming the ships and their crews. As the raids became successful, the pirates became bolder. They began seizing UN aid ships, and even attacked a cruise liner attempting to capture it for ransom. The U.S. and Coalition vessels from Combined Task Force 150 began actively pursuing pirate vessels in an attempt to deter the attacks.
The battle[]
On 18 March the destroyer USS Gonzalez intercepted a suspicious ship, a large diesel skiff towing two small gasoline-powered "attack" skiffs 25 nautical miles (46 km) off the Somali coast.[3][4] USS Gonzalez first noticed the common pirate profile of a diesel boat towing smaller skiffs and, with USS Cape St. George closing from 40 miles away, trailed the suspects until dawn.[5] Shortly before sunrise, the two American ships each sent a pair of rigid-hulled inflatable boats with specially trained boarding teams to investigate.[5] The boats' boarding attempt was aborted when the pirates opened fire on them from extremely short range, and they returned fire and withdrew.
The pirates chased the boarding team, then opened fire upon the Navy ships with RPGs and other small arms.[5] Too close for major weapon systems, the two American ships returned fire with small caliber guns.[3][4] The larger pirate skiff was soon set on fire by a .50 Caliber tracer round fired from the USS Gonzalez hitting and setting ablaze a 55-gallon fuel drum, and burned to the waterline.[5] The two small skiffs were engaged and surrendered to USS Cape St. George upon seeing the larger skiff with all their fuel in flames.[5] By the time the action was over at least one pirate was killed (only one body was recovered from one of the remaining small skiffs), and 12 (including 5 wounded) pirates were captured.[6] A spokesman for the Somali pirate militia in Hardhere claimed there were 27 pirates that had gone to sea to act as "coastguardsmen" for the largely lawless state.[5] Cape St. George received minor superficial damage but no US forces were injured.[3][4][6]
Aftermath[]
After the action was over a Dutch fast combat support ship, HNLMS Amsterdam, provided medical assistance to the wounded and the two US ships continued on their mission.[3][4] The US Government chose not to prosecute the captured men for piracy, and repatriated them over a period of several months, some requiring advanced medical care aboard US and Coalition warships due to the injuries they received during the action.[7]
References[]
- ↑ http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/01066.htm
- ↑ http://www.navsource.org/archives/04/1171/040171.htm
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 "U.S. Navy Ships Return Fire on Suspected Pirates". American Forces Press Service. 18 March 2006. http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15128.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Dorsey, Jack (20 March 2006). "Captain praises response of crew to pirate skirmish". The Virginian-Pilot. http://hamptonroads.com/2006/03/captain-praises-response-crew-pirate-skirmish.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Besheer, Margaret (18 March 2006). "US Navy Ships Return Fire on Suspected Pirates Off Somali Coast". Voice of America. Archived from the original on 16 December 2008. http://web.archive.org/web/20081216202859/http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2006-03/2006-03-18-voa32.cfm.
- ↑ doi:10.1162/wopj.2009.25.4.41
This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
The original article can be found at Action of 18 March 2006 and the edit history here.